Uncategorized

The 2001 Lasch Building incident- Never Happened-

 

This post is from 2013. The processor here gets slower and slower until it takes an hour to write a paragraph. These posts are edited for easier reading. Keep in mind that the information was before I knew a lot of what I know now. It is interesting how I theorized, but was close to the truth.

LOGBOOK. IN PATERNO’S OFFICE.

THE INFORMATION FROM THE 2001 INCIDENT WAS NOT ABOUT SANDUSKY. IT WAS A DIFFERENT INCIDENT. IT HAPPENED AT 9:30 IN THE MORNING AT THE LOCKER ROOM IN THE BUILDING WHERE PATERNO’S OFFICE WAS. IT HAPPEND IN THE SHOWER ROOM. THERE WERE NO PEOPLE IN THE SHOWER. IT WAS ONLY SOUNDS. THERE WAS NO SUSPICION OF CHILD ABUSE. THE POLICE AND SECURITY DID NOT INVESTIGATE THE MATTER FURTHER.   THE E AND SECURITY DID NOT KEEP A RECORD OF THE INCIDENT.

SCULTZ CAME TO THE OFFICE OF JOE PATERNO. A STUDENT WAS WITH HIM. THE STUDENT TYPED A BRIEF ON THE SHOWER ROOM INCIDENT. NOTHING MORE HAPPENED. THERE WAS NO MOLESTATION OR SUSPICION OF CHILD ABIUSE. THE MATTER WAS FORGOTTEN.

LATER SOMEONE OBTAINED THE INFORMATION ABOUT THE 2001 INCIDENT AND IT WOUND UP WITH FREEH AND THEN KELLY. THE 2001 INFORMATION WAS THOUGHT TO BE ABOUT SANDUSKY BUT IT WASN’T.  DO YOU UNDERSTAND?

THERE WAS NO PLACE TO GET THE 2001 INFORMATION; EXCEPT IN THE LOGBOOK. SOMEONE GOT THE INFORMATION. AND KEPT THE SOURCE A SECRET.

WHETHER THEY MISTOOK THE INFORMATION FOR THE SANDUSKY -_McQUEARY INCIDENT OR WHETHER THEY KNEW, AND LIED, IS BESIDE THE POINT. THE MATTER WAS THAT IT WAS POSSIBLE TO KNOW WHERE THE INFORMATION CAME FROM AND UNDERSTAND THAT IT DID NOT APPLY TO SANDUSKY.

THE INFORMATION WAS FALSIFIED.

THE 2001 EVIDENCE WAS FORGED.

NO ONE EXAMINED THE 2001 INFORMATION TO DETERMINE THE ACTUAL INCIDENT AND WHAT IT WAS ABOUT. AS LONG AS NO ONE SAID ANYTHING ABOUT THE 2001 INCIDENT THEY (THE PROSECUTORS) WERE SAFE. THEIR COVER UP WAS SECRET.

THEY DID NOT KNOW THAT THERE WAS ONLY ONE SOURCE OF THE 2001 INFORMATION. IT HAD TO BE OBTAINED ILLEGALY.

IT WAS POSSIBLE TO LEARN OF THE 2001 INCIDENT AFTER THE 2001 INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED BY FREEH OR KELLY. TO DETERMINE THAT THE 2001 INFORMATION HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE (SUPPOSED) SANDUSKY SHOWER ROOM INCIDENT. (THAT DID ACTUALLY HAPPEN IN 2002. NOT 2001.)

ONLY THE PEOPLE WHO HAD THE 2001 INFORMATION, FROM THE 2001 SHOWER ROOM INCIDENT, COULD KNOW ABOUT THE INFORMATION. AND THEY WOULD ALSO KNOW ABOUT THE BRIEF IN SCHULTZ OFFICE IF THEY LOOKED FOR IT, *AFTER SEEING THE INFORMATION FROM THE LOGBOOK OF PATERNO.

IT SEEMS THAT A MISTAKE WAS MADE ABOUT THE 2001 INFORMATION, TO BEGIN WITH. BUT IT WAS A MATTER OF DECEPTION AFTER THE INFORMATION WAS STUDIED. THEY DECEIVED PEOPLE BY FALSIFYING THE INFORMATION AND CLAIMED THAT IT WAS EVIDENCE PROOVING THAT SANDUSKY MOLESTED A CHILD IN THE SHOWER ROOM IN 2001, WHEN THEY KNEW IT WAS A LIE.

THEN THEY ACCUSED PENN STATE OFFICIALS OF COVERING UP THE 2001 INFORMATION THAT THEY KNEW HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH JERRY SANDUSKY.

ALSO; IT IS HIGHLY PROBABLE THAT THEY TRICKED THE JANITOR INTO BELEIVING THAT HE SAW SANDUSKY IN THE SHOWER ROOM, WHEN IT WAS A LOOK ALIKE PUTTING ON A STAGED ACT.

IT IS ALSO MOST LIKELY WHAT HAPPENED TO CERTAIN CHILDREN WHO WERE ALSO TRICKED.

I BELIEVE THAT THE TRICKS AND SLANDER, THE DEFAMATION, RUMORS, ACCCUSATIONS, FALSE CHARGES, PLANTING EVIDENCE, FALSIFYING EVIDENCE, ALLOWING FALSE TESTIMONY, (CONCERNING 2001), FABRICATING OR FORGING EVIDENCE, WAS ALL DIRECTED TOWARDS SANDUSKY OVER A LONG PERIOD OF TIME. MAKING HIS PROSECUTION A MATTER OF ATTRITION. ( THEIR ACTUAL TARGETS  WERE PENN STATE OFFICIALS.)

MOST LIKELY TO COVER CORRUPTION ON THE PART OF STATE OFFICIALS, INCLUDING LINDA KELLY, AND THE INVOLVEMENT OF INVESTIGATORS INTO UNIVERSITY SPORTS MATTERS, WHERE INVESTIGATIONS WERE USED TO COVER UP THE GATHERING OF INFORMATION THAT WAS USED TO PROMOTE GAMBLING INTERESTS AND TO PREDICT PLAYER OUTCOMES.

INFORMATION GATHERED FROM PATERNO’S LOGBOOK WAS PROBABLY SOLD TO CRIMMINALS – GAMBLERS- BOOKIES, AND IN THE PROCESS SOMEBODY WOUND UP WITH THE 2001 INFORMATION THAT WOUND UP IN THE HANDS OF THE FREEH INVESTIGATORS. AND THEN, INTO THE OFFICE OF LINDA KELLY.

T

I