Uncategorized

WordPress- Don Robbins -A cover up of a cover up was the real cover up at Penn State.

(A man posed as Jerry Sandusky, committed crimes, the police covered it up and blamed Sandusky.)

In 1998.   I thought the police, covered up  what the imposter had done close to the Student Services Admin building. I think that they started to frame Sandusky at  that time.

I mean, that was what I believed to be the start of them using Sandusky, to cover the other guy. (The imposter.)

Apparently, there was an attempted frame up on Sandusky at the Alamo Bowl. That is very disturbing. It means that the person who initially made the claim against Sandusky was coached by the people who attempted to frame him and those people knew about the imposter and possibly conspired against Sandusky. Was the imposter at the Alamo Bowl?

This means that they tried to cover the guy at Penn State in 1998 in the Student Services building incident  by suggesting the man was Sandusky. The man who caused the disturbance in the building was the same man who caused another disturbance outside of the building after the shower room incident.  This is the time line:

(1998 Shower room incident in the Student Services Building )  Calhoun believed the man he saw in the shower room was Sandusky. It wasn’t. The incident was (covered up) by the police.  –  Security guard wrote incident report. –  Sandusky was suspect in the disturbance. He wasn’t mentioned in the security report. The security guard knew the man causing the disturbance was not Sandusky. (A report was written.)  Disturbance after the incident outside the building- Police were called and responded.

Actually, it was the imposter that caused the disturbance. Police knew the man was not Sandusky. (This incident happened before the Alamo Bowl.)

This incident happened before the Alamo Bowl. And then, the interview in the woman’s house, with police in the back room listening to the conversation.

In reality, the police were trying to get Sandusky to admit he was in the Student Services building taking a shower with a child. This would implicate him because people thought they saw a man in the shower room at the Student Services building  with a child and heard screams. He didn’t implicate himself so the matter was dropped.

   It seems like the police were involved in framing Sandusky. I believe they were.

   These activities were covered up by the Grand Jury investigators and by Freeh investigators.

    I believe that witness tampering also took place. The security guard report on the imposter has never been mentioned. The security guard who wrote the report has never been heard from.

   It is apparent that Sandusky was framed and several agencies took part in falsely  accusing Penn State and wrongly convicted Jerry Sandusky.

   There was a cover up at Penn State by the city police. And a cover up of the original cover up was done by investigators.

  A cover up of a cover up was the real cover up at Penn State.

– See more at: http://donrobbins.typepad.com/blog/#sthash.mIQWvfPG.dpuf

2 thoughts on “WordPress- Don Robbins -A cover up of a cover up was the real cover up at Penn State.

  1. THE APOSTLE PAUL, THE SIN EXCUSE? BY STEVE FINNELL

    Christians who are opposed to practicing repentance need a proof-text to support their sinful lifestyle. They open the book of Romans, skip a few chapters until they supposedly find the reason they are still practicing the same sins they were before they became a believer in Jesus the Christ.

    THE PROF-TEXT OF UNREPENTANT CHRISTIANS

    Romans 7:14-17 For we know that the Law is spiritual, but I am of flesh, sold into sin. 15 For what I am doing , I do not understand; for I am not practicing what I would like to do, but I am doing the very thing I hate. 17 So now, no longer am I the one doing it, but sin dwells in me.

    The apostle Paul was sold to sin when he was trying to keep the Laws of Moses not when he was living under the grace of God.

    As a Christian, Paul was not sold into sin. As a Christian, Paul could resist sinning. As a Christian, Paul was not living a sinful lifestyle and then proclaiming the devil made him do it.
    Paul was not continually fornicating, stealing, practicing idolatry, engaging in homosexual activity, getting drunk, swindling others, murdering on a regular basis, he was not a member of a non-Christian cult like the Masonic Lodge? He was not living a unrepentant sinful lifestyle?

    WHAT DID PAUL SAY ABOUT CHRISTIANS AND SIN?

    Romans 7:5-6 For while we were in the flesh, the sinful passions, which were aroused by the Law, were at work in the members of our body to bear fruit for death. 6 But now we have been released from the Law, having died to that by which we were bound, so that we serve in newness of the Spirit and not in the oldness of the letter.

    Romans 6:1-2 What shall we say then? Are we to continue in sin so that grace may increase? 2 May it never be! How shall we who died to sin live in it?

    The apostle Paul did not live a sinful lifestyle.

    Romans 6:3-7…baptized into Christ Jesus…6 knowing this, that our old self was crucified with Him in order that our body of sin might be done away with, so that we would no longer be slaves to sin; 7 for he who has died is freed from sin.

    The apostle Paul was freed from sin when he was baptized into Christ for the forgiveness of his sins. (Act 22:16 Now why do you delay?Get up and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on His name.)

    Romans 6:14 For sin shall not be master over you,for you are not under law but under grace.

    The apostle Paul could not resist sin while he was under the Law of Moses. That was what he was talking about in (Romans 7:14-17).

    Romans 6:15-16 What then? Shall we sin because we are not under the law but under grace? May it never be! 16 Do you not know that when you present yourselves to someone as slaves for obedience, you are slaves of the one whom you obey, either of sin resulting in death, or of obedience resulting in righteousness?

    The apostle Paul could resist sin. The man named Saul had a sin problem; because he was living under the Law of Moses.

    Christians sin by choice, not because the devil made them do it. Is there a way out? Yes! (1 John 8-9 If we say that we have no sin, we are deceiving ourselves and the truth is not in us. 9 If we confess our sins, He is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.)

    THE QUESTION REMAINS; WHERE WILL THE UNREPENTANT CHRISTIANS SPEND ETERNITY?

    YOU ARE INVITED TO FOLLOW MY BLOG. http://steve-finnell.blogspot.com
    Posted by Steve Finnell at 2:15 AM No comments:
    Email This
    BlogThis!
    Share to Twitter
    Share to Facebook
    Share to Pinterest
    Links to this post

    Like

Comments are closed.