Uncategorized

This Is What I Know- I Believe Sandusky Is Innocent- I believe There Was Foul Play Covered Up By The Prosecutors. | DonRobbinsReturns

 

via This Is What I Know- I Believe Sandusky Is Innocent- I believe There Was Foul Play Covered Up By The Prosecutors. | DonRobbinsReturns.This Is What I Know- I Believe Sandusky Is Innocent- I believe There Was Foul Play Covered Up By The Prosecutors.

  Alamo bowl- Nothing

  1998- Calhoun (Smeal building siting) Nothing

  1998 Shower Room (Student Athlete Services building) Not Sandusky-  *Sandusky look alike with little man and George Steinbrenner and chauffer making a video mocking a sexual assault.
   Sandusky was not present. Calhoun apparently told it was Sandusky.
   Office broken into later that week where report probably was filed. (In the Student Athletic Services building)
    Security guard- myself and Calhoun witnessed the video taping in the shower room.
   
    *Ray Gricar- It was my theory that the security guard came up missing and Gricar traced the disappearance back to the shower room incident in 1998. And then Gricar came up missing.

     2000- Lasch building shower room siting by Petrosky and Calhoun. Same man that Calhoun saw in the shower room in 1998. (Not Sandusky.)

     2001- Shower room incident in the Student Athletic Services building. No person present in the shower room. Sounds only. Most likely sounds from fake tape made in 1998. Some of the same people saw me and played the sound effects when I entered the locker room with the people touring the campus.
     Log entry about the incident in Paterno’s notebook. Handwritten.
     Other information about the incident was typed on a paper in the office in the Student Athletic Services building office down the hall from the locker room. That paper was apparently filed in his office, by Schultz, and then forgotten about.

    2001- No other incident concerning a shower room on campus.
               Nothing was reported in 2001 about Jerry Sandusky. The incident that McQueary reported was actually in 2002. The Prosecutors were wrong. Whatever evidence they had about the 2001 incident was in the Student Athletic Services building at 9:00 in the morning. That evidence has not been made public. There may have also been a video tape that people thought Sandusky was in , but wasn’t.

   2002- Nothing. Mcqueary saw a man who looked like Sandusky with the little man. Little man had light brown wavy hair, gray blue eyes, was about 4’7 feet tall. Weight about 100 pounds.

    It looks like there was an attempted frame up on Jerry Sandusky- possibly an extortion attempt that went wrong. The security guard may have  came up missing after the report was filed. And the Gricar came up missing when he put the pieces of the puzzle together.
    Did the security guard come up missing? Was Gricar investigating the disaperance of the security guard?
    
    Did the look alike convince people he was Sandusky? Did he fondle children to make people believe it was Sandusky? We know he was making a video tape in the shower room in 1998. If people saw the tape they may have assumed it was Sandusky and then thought he was guilty. Is that the reason they became so motivated and sure he was guilty?

     I believe that is what happened. I believe that Sandusky is innocent.

      DID GRICAR SEE THE TAPE? DID BALDWIN? DID FREEH SEE THE TAPE? DID KELLY?
                   ?    WHERE IS THE TAPE  ?