Uncategorized

Grand Jury Penn State Investigation Received Falsified -Tainted Info

Where is the information that was handed to the Grand Jury in order to justify opening up a Grand Jury Investigation into the claims against Jerry Sandusky?   The 2001 information proves that the officials and Paterno did the right thing. The incident was reported to authorities and campus police. Calls were made to the police… Continue reading Grand Jury Penn State Investigation Received Falsified -Tainted Info

Uncategorized

What I Wrote On Google + About Penn State Case (Today)

   There is a record of (one) incident that happened in 2001 in the locker room showers at Penn State. It was in the morning, not at night. Sandusky was not there. The information from the 2001 incident was falsified to bring charges against Sandusky. (After the claim at the high school by the 15-year-old student.)… Continue reading What I Wrote On Google + About Penn State Case (Today)

Uncategorized

Mistakes? Or Wrong Doing by the Grand Jury? Penn State

  Mistakes Made by Investigators   Once, it is understood, that the incident in 2001 at the Penn State campus had nothing to do with the Sandusky incident, the question becomes, how did investigators get so mixed up on the information from two separate incidents?  Why was information from 2001 not further investigated? Was it… Continue reading Mistakes? Or Wrong Doing by the Grand Jury? Penn State

Uncategorized

The Prosecutors Knew Curley and Schultz Were Not Lying! Penn State

The prosecutors, in the court case against Penn State Officials, knew that the information from 2001 did not apply to Sandusky. They knew that McQueary did not inform the three (Paterno/Schultz/Curley) of anything, concerning a shower room in 2001. They charged the two (Schultz and Curley) with perjury, anyway. They were convicted of perjury even… Continue reading The Prosecutors Knew Curley and Schultz Were Not Lying! Penn State

Uncategorized

Falsified- Tainted- Forged Evidence. (They Knew It) Zealots

Let’s just say that the Grand Jury had the 2001 information but they did not have to name the source. The judge allowed the Grand Jury to hand over the 2001 information to prosecutors. And, in turn, they used it as evidence. The judge allowed the 2001 information to be used as evidence without checking… Continue reading Falsified- Tainted- Forged Evidence. (They Knew It) Zealots

Uncategorized

Not Too Complex- Read First

“ First of all… I was there in 2001 when the information was written into the logbook of Coach Joe Paterno, in his office. Later, I knew that there was no other incident concerning the shower room in 2001. There was no other place to acquire the 2001 information, except in Coach Joe Paterno’s logbook.… Continue reading Not Too Complex- Read First

Uncategorized

Definition Tainted-Falsified Evidence- Penn State

“Tainted Evidence-Falsified Evidence” http://www.zazzle.com/goodshot?pg=1&sd=desc&st=date_created Definition of Tainted evidence: Information that has been obtained by illegal means or has been revealed (or traced) using evidence acquired by illegal search, and or seizure, is called “the fruit of the poisonous tree” and is not admissible in many courts, including U.S. criminal courts. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_evidence Forged evidence: An item… Continue reading Definition Tainted-Falsified Evidence- Penn State